User System

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	ECT
Motherboard	MSI Z170-A PRO (MS-7971)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160511
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '18 at 20:42
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Memory 84.4 1-Core 101 2-Core 249 79% 145 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 666 68% 547 Pts	64-Core 678 42% 678 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	109% Outstanding	Lighting 146 Reflection 150 Parallax 135 119% 144 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 138 Splatting 107 96% 119 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63 12,393 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS131122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 64 79 77 51 73 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 473 Mixed 382 SusWrite 91.1 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 42.9 166% 63.8 MB/s	DQ Read 322 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 179 174% 275 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 91%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 112GB free Firmware: 2.25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 104 105 105 103 118 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 357 Write 139 Mixed 198 SusWrite 108 44% 201 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 40.5 162% 62.4 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 121 101% 147 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 931GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 166 163 186 163 158 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 179 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 165 103% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 141% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 107%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB 10,689 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 149GB free Firmware: 10.02E02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 60 61 61 61 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 58.8 Write 59.5 Mixed 43.8 SusWrite 60.3 41% 55.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR2 2x8GB 2,319 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.1% Good	MC Read 23.9 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 22 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 26.2 SC Mixed 20.7 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)