Livefan LIVEFAN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLivefan LIVEFAN  (all builds)
MotherboardINET P313R
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1081 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170725
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 22 '18 at 19:04
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3450
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Memory 41.9
1-Core 43.2
2-Core 84.3
33% 56.5 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 165
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4839
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.51% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.15
Parallax 2.03
2% 2.53 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 6.09
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.51%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NT-128 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T180226p
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 54 55 55 49 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 337
Write 344
Mixed 168
SusWrite 52.2
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 14.9
86% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 94.3
DQ Write 53.6
DQ Mixed 56.2
47% 68 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1.5GB
4 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 11
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIVEFAN Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Livefan LIVEFAN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback