Asus P8H67-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-V  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 24 '18 at 22:00
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 170
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 308
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Lighting 47.4
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 40.1
39% 40 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 43.4
Splatting 38
33% 40.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 19 19 32 26 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 322
Write 181
Mixed 248
SusWrite 35.6
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 14.8
81% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 21.4
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 16.7
27% 49.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35
27GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 66 66 74 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 79.5
Write 80.3
Mixed 54
SusWrite 69.2
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$50
1GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 61.8
Write 62.3
Mixed 50.8
44% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 74%
WD Purple Surveillance 3TB (2017)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 81 42 47 50 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 84.3
Write 74
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 56.9
51% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.4
102% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 110%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$84
28GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 21 20 34 26 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 75.5
Write 77.5
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 36.7
45% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M2A1600C8 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C8 029E CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 029E CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.3% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-V Builds (Compare 394 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $333
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $185Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback