Asrock X58 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock X58 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory19.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '16 at 17:41
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70% Good
Memory 94.5
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 165
71% 117 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 343
38% 297 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
EVGA(3842 1226) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.17.12.6099
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.81
Parallax 1.41
3% 3.6 fps
MRender 6.57
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 4
4% 4.38 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.9% Good
Read 270
Write 215
Mixed 204
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 31.3
126% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 58.7
DQ Mixed 49.1
57% 102 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 134%
WD Re 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 148
Write 130
Mixed 130
102% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.25
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.53
168% 1.62 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 84%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
140GB free
Firmware: 04.04V02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 114
Write 116
Mixed 78
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 2.94
4K Mixed 0.7
172% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 68%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
841GB free, PID 0570
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 122
Write 120
Mixed 57
122% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.52
71% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 49%
SAMSUNG HD642JJ 640GB
193GB free, PID 00a2
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 32
Write 26.5
Mixed 28.7
37% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 0.48
103% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 16.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 14.4
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock X58 Extreme3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $300
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback