Dell Xanadu

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Xanadu  (all builds)
MotherboardDell
Memory34.1 GB free of 40 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20080730
Uptime13.4 Days
Run DateAug 17 '18 at 20:40
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon L5420
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 31.1
2-Core 66.2
35% 53 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 110
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 185
12% 185 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 48%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 21 36 33 24 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 34
Write 26.3
Mixed 30
SusWrite 31.2
23% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBE82FF4A1RQ-6E-E 02FE7FB302FE EBE82FF4A1RQ-6E-E 83167FB380CE N*D517A21207FD53I5 83167FB3802C N*D517A21207FD53I5 80AD7FB380AD HYMP151F72CP8D5-Y5 80AD7FB380AD HYMP151F72CP8D5-Y5 80AD7FB380AD HYMP151F72CP8D5-Y5 80AD7FB380AD HYMP1... 40GB
667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.7
7% 2.4 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback