Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5660 2,343 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 92.8 1-Core 70.8 2-Core 138 63% 100 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 482 49% 394 Pts	64-Core 1,063 66% 1,063 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Lighting 25 Reflection 23.6 Parallax 31.1 20% 26.6 fps	MRender 33.2 Gravity 29.5 Splatting 24.8 23% 29.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 160GB 7,078 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV102M3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 225 Write 94.8 Mixed 74 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 29.4 4K Mixed 9.8 50% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 61.6 DQ Mixed 66.7 63% 102 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 46%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 299GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 15GB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 65 68 68 65 66 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 130 Write 64 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 66.4 61% 82 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 94%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 2TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 22 22 22 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 77 Write 18.2 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 21.6 26% 35.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 116%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 999GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 413GB free, PID 0b19 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 29 Write 24 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 25 33% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GB 261 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 19.7 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 9 26% 8.93 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	189x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16