Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '18 at 04:49
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 128
57% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 355
39% 307 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Lighting 48.2
Reflection 46.2
Parallax 41
39% 45.1 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 37.7
31% 37.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 279 103 102 109 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 467
Write 330
Mixed 380
SusWrite 178
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 45.9
146% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 260
194% 257 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 134%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA331 1TB
865GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 132 132 128 129 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 129
Write 128
Mixed 65
SusWrite 130
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 76%
SanDisk Cruzer Dial 16GB
9GB free, PID 5599
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 5.7 4.5 4.6 3.9 4.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 36
Write 3.3
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 4.6
14% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.2
142% 3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.1% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11.5
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback