Lenovo 20BE00A0ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20BE00A0ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BE00A0ZA
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '18 at 09:24
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 24.1
2-Core 44.7
32% 44.3 Pts
4-Core 62.8
8-Core 62.9
8% 62.8 Pts
64-Core 63.3
4% 63.3 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2210) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4889
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.42% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 2.42
Parallax 2.38
1% 2.05 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 2.83
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.42%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z331
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 105 134 115 134 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 397
Write 257
Mixed 339
SusWrite 136
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 12.6
65% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 33.4
60% 119 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Kingston 9905417-062.A00G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 11
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback