ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu CELSIUS V840

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS V840 (all builds)
Motherboard	Tyan D2533
Memory	28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090723
Uptime	5.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '18 at 12:25
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2384 28 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU0-Socket 940, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Memory 70.4 1-Core 31.2 2-Core 79.5 40% 60.4 Pts	4-Core 159 8-Core 278 26% 219 Pts	64-Core 318 20% 318 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 285 2,842 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Nvidia(10DE 065B) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	9.49% Terrible	Lighting 13.1 Reflection 9.23 Parallax 5.91 11% 9.42 fps	MRender 9.52 Gravity 10.5 Splatting 6.91 7% 8.97 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.49% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603A SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 100 100 99 99 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Read 186 Write 122 Mixed 136 SusWrite 97.3 30% 136 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 54.2 4K Mixed 26.1 96% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 30.3 DQ Write 94 DQ Mixed 39.1 37% 54.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 73%
Fujitsu MBA3073RC 73GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 68GB free Firmware: HPF1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 116 115 116 116 115 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 116 Write 116 Mixed 78 SusWrite 115 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 1.5 297% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 66%
Samsung HD081GJ 80GB 966 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 58GB free Firmware: GE10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 70 71 72 72 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 67.5 Write 70 Mixed 43.5 SusWrite 70.6 46% 62.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 42%
Samsung HD200HJ 200GB 2,663 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 95GB free Firmware: KF10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 67 66 67 66 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	39.4% Below average	Read 70.8 Write 66.5 Mixed 46 SusWrite 66.4 46% 62.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 53%
Seagate ST31000528AS 500GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 340GB free Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 90 90 91 91 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 121 Write 118 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 90 69% 94.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x4GB 5,222 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DRAM Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.6% Poor	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 10.2 28% 9.97 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 5.3 13% 4.53 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 148%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback