Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics4.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 24 '18 at 01:18
Run Duration680 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 140
2-Core 277
93% 169 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 869
86% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,136
70% 1,136 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 240
XFX(1682 7240) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.31% Terrible
Lighting 5.13
Reflection 6.27
Parallax 6.75
4% 6.05 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 5.27
Splatting 6.3
5% 5.46 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.31%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK10D7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.1 203 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 450
Write 217
Mixed 238
SusWrite 49.7
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 19
44% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 41.9
DQ Write 68.3
DQ Mixed 178
100% 96.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
367GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.3 133 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 124
Write 120
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 44.4
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 88%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
726GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 1.5 90 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 96.8
Write 83.3
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 30
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 59%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
119GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.4 41 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 41
Write 40
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 13.9
42% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 42%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
3GB free, PID 6387, Multilaser 8Gb
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.3 1.4 2.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 4.5
Write 2.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 0.7
4% 3.22 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4133 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.2% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 19.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 21.7
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,030
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback