Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75 Pro4-M  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1804 x 1004 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '16 at 16:23
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Athlon II X4 750K-$84
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
50% Above average
SC Int 82.6
SC Float 70.7
SC Mixed 76.3
61% 76.5 Pts
QC Int 257
QC Float 215
QC Mixed 248
54% 240 Pts
MC Int 256
MC Float 218
MC Mixed 248
36% 241 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
MSI(1462 2382) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5382
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
22.7% Poor
Lighting 63.8
Reflection 64.6
Parallax 58.6
19% 62.3 fps
MRender 56.4
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 53.5
25% 59.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 25%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB3Q128G 128GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X218 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 459
Write 305
Mixed 356
83% 373 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 25.6
127% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 51.1
77% 145 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 89%
Toshiba MK3276GSX 320GB-$25
113GB free
Firmware: GS00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 57.1
Write 65.5
Mixed 52.3
44% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.27
69% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 47%
Toshiba MK3276GSX 320GB-$25
81GB free
Firmware: GS00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 64.3
Write 61.8
Mixed 58.7
46% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.32
80% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 47%
WD Elements 2TB
216GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 34.8
Mixed 25.7
40% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.22
65% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 99U5471-047.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 257 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
21.8% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 7.1
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 30%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical FM2A75 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $160
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $289Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $121
Intel Core i7-7700K $275AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $176SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $951SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback