Average Bench: 3.37% (423rd of 665)

Based on 127,836 user benchmarks.  Devices: 10DE 128B, 10DE 1289, 10DE 1281 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GeForce GT 710 averaged 96.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 4.28fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 3.94fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce GT 710 is just 0.81%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce GT 710 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 4.77fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 4.46fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 127,836 samples)
Min Avg Max
3.3 Lighting 4.28 4.92
2.9 Reflection 4.77 6.5
3.6 Parallax 4.46 5.2
3.47% 4.5 fps
Min Avg Max
2.48 MRender 4.62 6.5
3.8 Gravity 3.94 4
4.7 Splatting 4.95 5.7
3.27% 4.51 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 1174 MHz, MLim: 480 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 5.2
4% 4.9 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 6.1
4% 5.07 fps
Gigabyte(1458 375A) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 5
4% 5.67 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.13 fps
Gigabyte(1458 375A) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 5
4% 5.33 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.13 fps
Asus(1043 8770) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 5
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 5.1 fps
Gigabyte(1458 375A) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 5
4% 4.9 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
3% 4.77 fps
Nvidia(10DE 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 4.1
3% 3.87 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
3% 4.03 fps
127,836 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 44,937,311 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 127,836 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
MSI(1462 8C93) 29% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 85E7) 13% 4% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 7326) 6% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 36F7) 6% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 85F7) 6% 4% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 118B) 5% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 375A) 3% 3% ± 0%
Device(7377 0000) 3% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8572) 3% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 128B) 3% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 400A) 3% 4% ± 0%
PNY(196E 118B) 2% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 86DF) 2% 4% ± 0%
Asus(1043 86CB) 2% 4% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2713) 2% 3% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 6326) 2% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8770) 1% 4% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 1% 3% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 5360) 1% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 376C) 1% 4% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 401F) 1% 4% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2711) 1% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8576) 1% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 375B) 1% 4% ± 0%
PNY(196E 118C) 1% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 36FA) 1% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 36F9) 1% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 36F8) 0% 3% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2712) 0% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 36F4) 0% 3% ± 0%
PNY(196E 118A) 0% 3% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2717) 0% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 866F) 0% 3% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B 326A) 0% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3FE2) 0% 4% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 6324) 0% 4% ± 0%
Dell(1028 118B) 0% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 118A) 0% 3% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GeForce GT 710 Builds (Compare 38,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $332

Popular GeForce GT 710 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Terrible

12 days ago.

Pretty Good, i have 630 graphics and i believe this, (i also recently installed a 710, and you better be right.)


Good

7 days ago.

Just a massive waste of money. If you need a low power card get a GT 1030 and if you want something to game with you're better off with integrated graphics.


Excellent

16 hrs ago.

its only use is in case you would want to add more displays to your computer. it can play most flash games perfectly fine and is good for basic tasks.


Average

3 months ago.

English: For play Gta 5 (30fps), Fortnite (30fps), Assetto Corsa (35fps) and Rocket League (40fps), but don't work for Warzone. Spanish: Para jugar Gta 5 (30 fps), Fortnite (30 fps), Assetto Corsa (35 fps) y Rocket League (40 fps), pero no funcionan para Warzone.


Good

3 months ago.

A low-rise version of this is great in small form factor pcs, but don't expect to be able to run more than minecraft or skyrim at (very) low settings. A Quadro K620 is a better option probably - if you can find one. Or of course a GT 1030 or something like that, but that's a different price point than the 710.


Excellent

2 months ago.

its mine, not gonna lie you underrate it a little bit!


Good

6 months ago.

Better than a standard Intel hd


Excellent

1 month ago.

i have it and it sucks so much. i want a better gpu but i need a low profile because i have a ultra slim computer


Excellent

12 months ago.

it is not as bad as they say it gives me on dolphin (wii emulator) good results with rescaletion at 1080p (in sonic unleashed which is limited to 30fps) and it gives me 25fps (in fight it gets down) I think they say it is bad because they have better graphics cards


Excellent

6 months ago.

Very good overclocking capabilites, can be faster than a GT 1030


Good

4 months ago.

Best high-end card for gaming!


Good

10 months ago.

I can even run GTA V on this Graphics Card , Because of the DDR5 VRam


Excellent

5 months ago.

Because it’s 412% better than my graphics card lol


Terrible

18 months ago.

Not for gaming. Good if you need something to see for CPU-intense stuff with a 3600 or higher AMD CPU.


Terrible

4 months ago.

Stop buying that ancient artifact brand new! Just get a gt 1030 or an apu!


Average

23 months ago.

Runs Strucid, Prison royale and web games at 60 fps. However it will struggle with games such as apex legends as it does not render lighting and detailed textures well.


Average

5 months ago.

On stock settings, it's terrible, specially those with DDR3 as VRAM, however, if you modify the BIOS of this card to unlock the voltage, you can match a GT 730 GDDR5 with ease (Mine did bench a solid 5% with 1386MHz of core and almost 3GHz of memory, it is on the benchmarks section of my profile with an E-350, more or less what a GT 730 does bench). Insane overclocking headroom for such small card with a really good success rate, I got a pair of GT 710s for the price of a single GT 730, so I'm not complaining.


Average

2 years ago.

Not a graphics card for gaming. Think of it as a card to use if your CPU doesn't have integrated graphics and you don't game. It's more for watching videos, (there was a time when intel CPUs were not capable of watching 1080p videos)


Average

2 years ago.

good for an old pc upgrade


Average

23 months ago.

I use this to play gta 4 w evreting on low n 768p, playable but not the best


Good

4 months ago.

Good for CPUs with very weak GPU or without GPU at all. Good for watching videos. For games a GTX or similar GPU and at least a average CPU is recommended.


Your
opinion?
665 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $379Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback