Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory58 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150926
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMay 23 '16 at 18:03
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 193
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 568
55% 453 Pts
64-Core 569
35% 569 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200
Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5413
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.6% Poor
Lighting 30.8
Reflection 36.2
Parallax 40.9
25% 36 fps
MRender 48
Gravity 34.9
Splatting 29.2
30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM87 512GB
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2D0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 480
Mixed 489
110% 490 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 32
136% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 132
126% 201 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 101%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
2TB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 193
Mixed 162
136% 182 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.22
83% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 64GB
56GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 23.8
Write 10.6
Mixed 14.4
19% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.36
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 1.41
110% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 42.9
MC Mixed 35.8
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 16
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback