PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Supermicro X10DAi (all builds) |
Motherboard | Supermicro X10DAI |
Memory | 57 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140711 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Mar 17 '21 at 05:57 |
Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
Run User | VNM-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
65.1%
Good
|
64% 113 Pts
|
56% 466 Pts
|
98% 1,587 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
|
20.5%
Poor
|
18% 27.4 fps
|
26% 31.8 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston SSDNow KC300 480GB-$85
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 214 220 195 189 189 MB/s
|
58.9%
Above average
|
61% 273 MB/s
|
77% 22.4 MB/s
|
93% 137 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
555GB free
Firmware: BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 431 415 399 402 407 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
90% 400 MB/s
|
155% 53.4 MB/s
|
220% 320 MB/s
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
60.4%
Good
|
66% 23 GB/s
|
34% 12 GB/s
|
39% 102 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples | 12x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 10x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v41stBench 64%, 1,389 samples | 9x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 10x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 9x |
RTX 3090Nvidia $785Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $206 |