Alienware Aurora

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 04VWF2
Memory11.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '18 at 01:17
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 80.2
2-Core 136
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 398
40% 324 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
EVGA(3842 2784) 3GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.1% Average
Lighting 59.3
Reflection 54.3
Parallax 70.9
48% 61.5 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 51.2
50% 63.2 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ARRAY0 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 39 26 37 33 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 81.5
Write 160
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 33
55% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
246% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 113%
ARRAY1 68GB
63GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 42 32 39 36 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 41.8
Write 40.5
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 36.8
25% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 102%
WD Elements 2TB
359GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 27 27 28 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 27.8
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 27
37% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
40% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11.4
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora Builds (Compare 506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Alienware Aurora

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $249
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback