Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$191 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	50.1% Above average	Memory 71.2 1-Core 60.6 2-Core 99.7 49% 77.2 Pts	4-Core 159 8-Core 242 25% 200 Pts	64-Core 260 16% 260 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180 23,273 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1005 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Lighting 16 Reflection 19.2 Parallax 14.6 13% 16.6 fps	MRender 24 Gravity 17.3 Splatting 19.3 16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM00.r SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 123 235 220 105 249 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.8% Above average	Read 249 Write 240 Mixed 206 SusWrite 174 49% 217 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 45.9 4K Mixed 26.1 88% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 31.3 58% 113 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 40GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 108 118 118 118 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	70.9% Very good	Read 134 Write 118 Mixed 29 SusWrite 113 71% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB 12,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 33GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 87 85 85 86 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 91 Write 80.8 Mixed 55.5 SusWrite 85.2 58% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-10-9 DDR3-1866 4x4GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	44.5% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 14.6 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 12.5 SC Mixed 13.3 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 98.6 41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 72%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

RAM
99U5471-040.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 2,012 samples	4x
9905403-439.A00LF 9905403-437.A01LF 12GBKingstonBench 49%, 3 samples	3x
KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/8GX KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX2400C11D3/8GX 32GBKingstonBench 52%, 3 samples	3x

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $507

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16