Lenovo 20FAS3CN00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20FAS3CN00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FAS3CN00
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160602
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateDec 13 '18 at 22:13
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 160
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 280
38% 281 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2234) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4312
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.69% Terrible
Lighting 7.63
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 7.44
6% 8.45 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 5.97
Splatting 14
8% 8.58 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.69%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandis SD8TN8U256G1001 256GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X412
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 91 91 92 92 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 293
Write 236
Mixed 171
SusWrite 96.5
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 17
68% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 22.5
84% 187 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback