| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 99.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Intel X79 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170628 |
| Uptime | 4.9 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 29 '18 at 14:01 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
71.6%
Very good
|
71% 123 Pts
|
49% 379 Pts
|
29% 468 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Asus(1043 8469) 3GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.6%
Average
|
45% 58.4 fps
|
47% 58.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 168 135 137 128 124 MB/s
|
99.5%
Outstanding
|
81% 363 MB/s
|
168% 57.7 MB/s
|
272% 362 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
616GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 191 189 187 191 190 MB/s
|
110%
Outstanding
|
112% 154 MB/s
|
148% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5402-435.A 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
43.6%
Average
|
43% 15.1 GB/s
|
34% 11.8 GB/s
|
53% 75.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,978 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel X79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 339x |
| Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 268x |
| Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples | 143x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 126x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 114x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 108x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $158 |