Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion AV010AA-ABA p6212f (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Benicia
Memory	4.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090910
Uptime	7.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '18 at 14:48
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5300-$59 18,604 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Memory 69 1-Core 37.4 2-Core 71.9 40% 59.4 Pts	4-Core 71.5 8-Core 71.1 10% 71.3 Pts	64-Core 73.6 5% 73.6 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI FirePro V5800 (FireGL V) 444 User benchmarks, average bench 9% AMD(1002 2303) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.850.7.3000 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	9.77% Terrible	Lighting 12.6 Reflection 9.27 Parallax 10.7 10% 10.8 fps	MRender 9.48 Gravity 9.27 Splatting 12.7 9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.77% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78 26,547 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 183 59 80 176 20 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.9% Above average	Read 247 Write 245 Mixed 228 SusWrite 113 47% 208 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 29.1 98% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 144 121% 175 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 4.2 14% 4.73 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 5.3 14% 5 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16