IBM 3850 M2 / x3950 M2 -[72332RG]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIBM 3850 M2 / x3950 M2 -[72332RG]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM Node1 Processor Card
Memory29.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '19 at 16:48
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E7420
Node 1 CPU 3, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34% Below average
Memory 45.5
1-Core 30.5
2-Core 60.9
29% 45.6 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 209
20% 166 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID-MR10k 438GB
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 21 20 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.6% Above average
Read 156
Write 20.9
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 20.2
43% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 67%
Philips USB Flash Drive 32GB
26GB free, PID 5500, Philips USB Flash Drive
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 26 25 26 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 21.9
Mixed 10
SusWrite 23
27% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.1
69% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.83 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 2.5
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback