PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme3 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20131003 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 09 '19 at 08:30 |
Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
41.2%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280-$185
CLim: 940 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.9.2
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ztssd-s1 1-120G-TD 120GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 98 96 33 62 60 MB/s
|
49.7%
Average
|
|||
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
994GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 112 110 115 115 MB/s
|
58.4%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ16GX3M4X1600C9G CMZ16GX3M4X1600C9G 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
28.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 89x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 54x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 43x |
GPU | |
---|---|
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples | 15x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 15x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $773 |