Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N4200 10,928 User benchmarks, average bench 30% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Memory 44.5 1-Core 50.5 2-Core 97.5 37% 64.2 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 194 26% 194 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 7,629 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 07B2) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	3.6% Terrible	Lighting 3.97 Reflection 4.35 Parallax 3.53 3% 3.95 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 3.6 Splatting 6.65 4% 5.08 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 3.6% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E128-11 SATA 128GB 5,529 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: C27110B SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 142 118 123 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 288 Write 143 Mixed 160 SusWrite 125 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 6.6 52% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 134 106% 149 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
0 4x2GB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 11 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 182 22% 182 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	21x
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	8x

GPU
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	19x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	6x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	2x

SSD
CV8-8E128-11 SATA 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 5,529 samples	7x
X600 M.2 2280 SATA 128GBSandiskBench 63%, 4,471 samples	5x
X400 M.2 2280 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 12,357 samples	5x

RAM
4x1GB0Bench 24%, 523 samples	27x
4x2GB0Bench 28%, 142 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16