Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 72.2 1-Core 108 2-Core 216 73% 132 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 519 55% 441 Pts	64-Core 517 32% 517 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 891GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 99 103 103 102 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 90.7 Write 110 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 99.9 69% 93.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.7 182% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 72%
ST950032 5AS 500GB 98 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 92GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 22 18 23 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	8.94% Terrible	Read 18.7 Write 16.5 Mixed 16.7 SusWrite 21.3 25% 18.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 28% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.94% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GB 32,056 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 10.2 36% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 11.1 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 96.3 42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	2,168x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,684x
MX110NvidiaBench 6%, 6,322 samples	297x

SSD
SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 8,741 samples	130x
Optane+932GBHDD 1TBIntelBench 59%, 6,924 samples	121x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	101x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	638x
RMSA3260NA78HAF-2400 1x8GBRamaxelBench 36%, 7,851 samples	374x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 38,499 samples	360x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16