Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100528
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Aug 05 '16 at 13:04
Run Duration	473 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	57.8% Above average	Memory 84.4 1-Core 47.6 2-Core 94.3 50% 75.4 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 186 25% 185 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BB) Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Lighting 23.5 Reflection 17.5 Parallax 21 19% 20.7 fps	MRender 26.6 Gravity 19.5 Splatting 17.7 17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3039 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 449 (B1) Unknown 98 98 27 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 62 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11150871388	62.4% Good	Read 315 Write 323 Mixed 280 68% 306 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 18.5 95% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 34.2 DQ Write 57.9 DQ Mixed 18.4 22% 36.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 124%
WD Elements 1.5TB 5,064 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 445GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 30.1 Write 25.8 Mixed 7.8 25% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 0.34 4K Mixed 0.18 20% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 22%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 381GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 30.4 Write 27 Mixed 28.2 36% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.38 82% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 44%
Maxtor Basics Desktop 500GB 444 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 255GB free, PID 7410 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 30.6 Write 30.1 Mixed 29.8 39% 30.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.31 59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 20%
WD 10EAVS External 1TB 1,289 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 238GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 29.6 Write 29.2 Mixed 29.3 38% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.3 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 13.1 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9.3 22% 7.67 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-890GPA-UD3H Builds (Compare 166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	36x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	36x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples	17x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	39x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	30x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $203

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16