Asrock G31M-GS.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive17% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock G31M-GS.  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '19 at 09:21
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron E3300-$60
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.45 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 33
2-Core 52.2
36% 51.5 Pts
4-Core 61.2
8-Core 62.8
8% 62 Pts
64-Core 68.9
4% 68.9 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 26 34 31 30 23 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17% Very poor
Read 100
Write 45.8
Mixed 63
SusWrite 31.4
13% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 7.2
34% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 25.2
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 10.3
10% 15.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 17%
Great: 71%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
231GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 35 46 40 42 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 67.8
Write 56.2
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 42.6
39% 52.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$31
51GB free
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 22 19 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.29% Terrible
Read 11.8
Write 14
Mixed 11
SusWrite 20.5
10% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 9.29%
Great: 59%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
466GB free, PID 022b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 22 22 21 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
9.85% Terrible
Read 25.3
Write 23
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 21
28% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
32% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.85%
Great: 19%
WD Elements 500GB
98GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 20 20 21 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 23
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 19.6
29% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
25% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.8% Very poor
MC Read 2.4
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.77 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G31M-GS. Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock G31M-GS.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $138
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback