MSI MS-16JB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GL62MVR 7RFX
MotherboardMSI MS-16JB  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171027
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMar 21 '19 at 22:54
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 213
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 596
62% 496 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 11D5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4708
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.6% Terrible
Lighting 7.17
Reflection 8.77
Parallax 6.41
6% 7.45 fps
MRender 6.95
Gravity 6.43
Splatting 14.3
8% 9.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.6%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11D5) 3GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2177 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 71.3
Parallax 62.8
50% 65.4 fps
MRender 75.5
Gravity 63.7
Splatting 73.4
58% 70.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 297 294 303 283 285 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 468
Mixed 375
SusWrite 306
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 59.9
208% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 340
258% 347 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 119%
Great: 116%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
339GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 86 84 87 88 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 75.5
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 85.9
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
142% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 72%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
106GB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 72 75 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 83
Write 85.8
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 77.2
88% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 59%
WD 3200AAJ External 320GB
124GB free, PID 1001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 34.3
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 21.4
38% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 22%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
163GB free, PID ce23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 38.8
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 21.1
43% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 11.2
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.7
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16JB Builds (Compare 1,702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-16JB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback