Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 02 '16 at 17:41
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 46.6
2-Core 94.1
49% 74.6 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 268
28% 228 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
Gigabyte(1458 21FA) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.100.0.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 19.4
18% 19.3 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 20
14% 16.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 85.9
Write 67
Mixed 71.1
56% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.35
72% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 56%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
62GB free
Firmware: 03.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
60% Above average
Read 111
Write 97.6
Mixed 90.8
75% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.45
115% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60%
Great: 62%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 127GB
118GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 14.2
Mixed 22.5
28% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.06
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.69
79% 1.69 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.4% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.9
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7.9
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $516
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback