Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 84 1-Core 103 2-Core 206 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 395 52% 393 Pts	64-Core 394 24% 394 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 852D) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.18% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2.54 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.45 fps	MRender 2.57 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.78 1% 1.74 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.18% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS64GSSD420K 64GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1225CE SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 106 105 106 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Read 485 Write 109 Mixed 164 SusWrite 105 47% 216 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 81.1 4K Mixed 36.9 137% 49.7 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 109 92% 135 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965432-082.A00LF 2x4GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 17.4 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 16.9 46% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

SSD
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	2x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
Extreme Pro 480GBSanDisk $199Bench 93%, 9,250 samples	1x

RAM
9965525-055.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 50 samples	2x
M391B1G73QH0-YK0 M391B1G73QH0-YK0 Winbond 25X/Q Series 16GBSamsungBench 42%, 2 samples	2x
9965525-138.A00LF 4x8GBKingstonBench 58%, 225 samples	1x

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $639

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16