Gigabyte GA-X58A-OC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-OC  (all builds)
Memory17 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111212
Uptime7.3 Days
Run DateJun 04 '19 at 16:54
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 96.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 209
79% 135 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 513
56% 440 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 1158 MHz, MLim: 1480 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 41% Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,272
Write 3,722
Mixed 3,611
862% 3,868 MB/s
4K Read 165
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 97.8
422% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 410
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 319
239% 324 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
SiImage 100GB
43GB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 125 133 142 138 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 554
Write 143
Mixed 182
SusWrite 131
55% 252 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 27.4
99% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 170
134% 190 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 70%
SiImage 220GB
106GB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 120 119 120 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 575
Write 128
Mixed 180
SusWrite 120
55% 251 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 26.6
98% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 147
120% 175 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 67%
WD Blue SSHD 4TB (2015)-$65
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 127 130 109 90 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 108
Write 114
Mixed 65
SusWrite 99.1
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 83%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
501GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 144 144 144 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 164
Write 157
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 144
86% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
241% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 108%
LaCie 2Big Quadra v3 6TB
3TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 204 202 204 205 205 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.1% Excellent
Read 173
Write 159
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 203
197% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.3
186% 2 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.7% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 23.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 16.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 50.6
79% 50.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-OC Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-OC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $560
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback