Sun K85AE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSun K85AE  (all builds)
MotherboardSun K85AE
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20060317
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 11 '19 at 21:19
Run Duration922 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 250
CPU1 , 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 94.7
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 5.7
38% 42.7 Pts
4-Core 17.9
8-Core 30.8
3% 24.3 Pts
64-Core 64.6
4% 64.6 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 3000
Nvidia(10DE 01C2) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 9.6.8.5
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.13
Reflection 0.27
0% 0.2 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST373207LW 73GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 19 17 15 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 23.6
Write 5
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 18.9
11% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
30% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
6.78% Terrible
MC Read 0.6
MC Write 0.6
MC Mixed 0.6
2% 0.6 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 0.8
SC Mixed 0.6
2% 0.53 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 6.78%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback