PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 96.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision Tower 5810 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds) |
Memory | 20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160701 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 26 '19 at 21:19 |
Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
60.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.2
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
96.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 322 441 465 388 325 MB/s
|
98.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 9ASF51272PZ-2G1A2 18ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 9ASF51272PZ-2G1A2 24GB
2400, 2133, 2400, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
|
65.1%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,244x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 959x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 412x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 418x |
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 386x |
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples | 287x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 27% - Poor | Total price: $79 |