Packard EasyNote TS11HR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPackard EasyNote TS11HR  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJV50_HR
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '19 at 21:10
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 86.5
1-Core 80.2
2-Core 147
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 192
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Acer(1025 0511) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.17% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.58
Parallax 1.59
2% 2.52 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 4.48
3% 2.99 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.17%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 250G 250GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 213 214 196 212 205 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 440
Write 435
Mixed 269
SusWrite 215
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 28.2
95% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 258
216% 313 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 105%
WDC WD64 00AACS-00G8B1 640GB
21GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 29
Write 22.8
Mixed 22
SusWrite 15.7
29% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 23%
Generic Mass-Storage 4GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5 5.2 5.4 4.9 4.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
6.98% Terrible
Read 9.5
Write 5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 4.9
7% 5.97 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.5
104% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.98%
Great: 10%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
23GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 15 14 15 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 30
Write 22.3
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 15.2
28% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.1
80% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 15.5
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 14.5
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TS11HR Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TS11HR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $189
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback