Hp-pavilion KC880AA-ABA m9150f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion KC880AA-ABA m9150f (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Benicia
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090910
Uptime	6.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '16 at 00:52
Run Duration	675 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Memory 69.4 1-Core 27.4 2-Core 55.4 36% 50.7 Pts	4-Core 107 8-Core 108 14% 108 Pts	64-Core 108 7% 108 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% EVGA(3842 1556) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7254 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Lighting 11.5 Reflection 13.4 Parallax 9.78 9% 11.6 fps	MRender 12.8 Gravity 12.3 Splatting 15.8 11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 812GB free (System drive) Firmware: 51.0AB51 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Read 109 Write 83.9 Mixed 79.5 68% 90.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.18 83% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 69%
Seagate ST3360320AS 360GB-$79 6,615 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 123GB free Firmware: 3.CHL Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 60 Write 52.6 Mixed 45.9 40% 52.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.21 78% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 44%
WD My Book Essentials 2TB 1,714 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 2TB free, PID 1110 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 31.9 Write 28.6 Mixed 30 38% 30.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.16 47% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 22%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB 2TB free, PID 2567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.7% Very poor	Read 29 Write 25.8 Mixed 27.1 35% 27.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.19 62% 0.8 MB/s

WDC WD10 EARX-00N0YB0 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 511GB free, PID 2567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 27 Mixed 27.6 36% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.25 76% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 16%
CENTON 16GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 10GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	4.84% Terrible	Read 15.7 Write 6.59 Mixed 9.76 12% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.64 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.006 18% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.84% Great: 8%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 4GB 1,130 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 3GB free, PID 556b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	6.11% Terrible	Read 16.5 Write 3.3 Mixed 6.45 9% 8.74 MB/s	4K Read 4.63 4K Write 0.62 4K Mixed 1.15 78% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.11% Great: 12%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 4GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 0GB free, PID 000d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.1% Very poor	Read 31.1 Write 20.7 Mixed 24.8 31% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.72 4K Write 0.09 4K Mixed 0.09 35% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 4.4 14% 5.03 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 5.2 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical KC880AA-ABA m9150f Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion KC880AA-ABA m9150f

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	8x

GPU
GeForce 9600 GSNvidiaBench 3%, 508 samples	5x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	1x

SSD
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	4x
ssd 512GBBench 73%, 4,609 samples	1x
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	7x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $125

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16