Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100609
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '19 at 02:43
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Memory 64.4 1-Core 79.4 2-Core 135 55% 93 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 207 28% 206 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Nvidia(10DE 0977) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	2.02% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 1.65 Parallax 2 2% 1.98 fps	MRender 3.38 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 2.74 2% 2.85 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.02% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
MZ-5S71000-0D3 100GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: VBC3CD3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 110 119 117 118 119 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	Read 151 Write 93.8 Mixed 81.8 SusWrite 114 25% 110 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 11.5 4K Mixed 10.2 37% 11.2 MB/s	DQ Read 13.8 DQ Write 12 DQ Mixed 14.8 10% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 43%
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 174GB free Firmware: SBFME1.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 123 127 128 147 138 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.7% Below average	Read 169 Write 89.4 Mixed 139 SusWrite 134 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 19.8 4K Mixed 15 49% 15.8 MB/s	DQ Read 18.4 DQ Write 47.7 DQ Mixed 21.6 20% 29.2 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 95%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 772 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 398GB free, PID ce17 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 21 21 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 25.9 Write 18.9 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 20.9 28% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 52GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.7% Below average	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 14.1 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 8.8 23% 8.17 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 36%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	82x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	53x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	41x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	11x
ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 44GBUnknownBench 39%, 12 samples	11x
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	9x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16