Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	7.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-8950HK 14,729 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	94% Outstanding	Memory 89.7 1-Core 140 2-Core 276 93% 169 Pts	4-Core 529 8-Core 845 84% 687 Pts	64-Core 1013 63% 1013 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 0832) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.13% Terrible	Lighting 6.77 Reflection 124 Parallax 8.06 6% 46.3 fps	MRender 13 Gravity 7.23 Splatting 16.1 10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.13% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kxg60znv1t02 NVMe TOSHIBA 1024GB 2,759 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 425GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10604106 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1766 1540 1552 1561 1547 1557 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	291% Outstanding	Read 1,661 Write 1,802 Mixed 1,456 SusWrite 1,587 367% 1,627 MB/s	4K Read 47.8 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 73.6 240% 86.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,278 DQ Write 1,102 DQ Mixed 1,028 815% 1,136 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 291% Great: 312%
Samsung PM851 mSATA 1TB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 156GB free Firmware: EXT49D1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 342 342 342 341 340 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Read 460 Write 340 Mixed 238 SusWrite 341 77% 345 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 80.5 4K Mixed 31 139% 49.6 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 92.4 122% 223 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 94%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$96 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 85GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2319 Write 1,918 Mixed 1,621 434% 1,952 MB/s	4K Read 67.1 4K Write 171 4K Mixed 94.7 314% 111 MB/s	DQ Read 1,435 DQ Write 1,258 DQ Mixed 1,327 1,000% 1,340 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 4x16GB 395 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	MC Read 31.1 MC Write 35.2 MC Mixed 28.3 90% 31.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 37.1 SC Mixed 28.1 81% 28.2 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	533x
Quadro P3200NvidiaBench 55%, 1,890 samples	267x
Quadro P4200NvidiaBench 71%, 536 samples	129x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBToshibaBench 171%, 9,737 samples	86x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	70x
NVMe TOSHIBA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 196%, 7,642 samples	55x

RAM
HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 2x16GBUnknownBench 80%, 6,839 samples	118x
16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 2x16GBUnknownBench 79%, 7,078 samples	79x
16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 4x16GBUnknownBench 82%, 173 samples	50x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16