Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140318
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '16 at 05:43
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	33%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 102 2-Core 182 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 514 52% 421 Pts	64-Core 505 31% 505 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9480) CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.12.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Lighting 70.2 Reflection 64.9 Parallax 86.8 57% 74 fps	MRender 66.2 Gravity 66.5 Splatting 52.5 50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3356 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1085 (B1) Unknown 99 99 11 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 57 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 11 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16418985602	105% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 408 Mixed 419 99% 445 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 58.8 4K Mixed 42.5 146% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 114 145% 261 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 18GB free Firmware: DXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5210 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2086 (B1) Unknown 99 99 14 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 61 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 58 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4172991563	60.3% Good	Read 332 Write 164 Mixed 210 52% 235 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 25.3 101% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 52.8 62% 109 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 116%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 12,762 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1TB free Firmware: 0740 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 165 Mixed 160 126% 167 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.34 101% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 104%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$33 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 171 168 6408 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5215 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5384 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1890 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 47 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5167 (C2) HDA temperature 122 110 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	86.7% Excellent	Read 150 Write 152 Mixed 153 114% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.96 4K Write 3.29 4K Mixed 0.26 130% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 431GB free Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 169 4250 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4775 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 11693 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3223 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 89 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4685 (C2) HDA temperature 115 104 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57.7% Above average	Read 105 Write 95.6 Mixed 99.9 76% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.31 93% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 48GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 171 6216 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7270 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 199 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 5855 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2472 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 57 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 191 191 27545 (C2) HDA temperature 122 111 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	43.3% Average	Read 78.7 Write 72.1 Mixed 71 56% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.26 86% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 2,340 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.2% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 8 24% 8.43 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 8.2 24% 8.5 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V LE PLUS Builds (Compare 585 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS - $412

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	184x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	138x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	109x

GPU
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	37x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	35x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	24x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	13x
Ares DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 62%, 5,533 samples	10x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16