Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '20 at 20:25
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 55.9
2-Core 110
53% 83.2 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 356
34% 280 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 368F) 2GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Lighting 47.4
Reflection 44.3
Parallax 44.2
39% 45.3 fps
MRender 39.6
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 36.2
32% 39 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 1TB
636GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 102 122 135 141 113 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.6% Poor
Read 165
Write 99
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 123
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 10.5
46% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 10.9
DQ Write 15.4
DQ Mixed 13.5
10% 13.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 103%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
221GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 82 89 95 94 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 96.3
Write 87
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 90.1
61% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
460GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 102 112 119 121 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 129
Write 115
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 113
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
434GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 94 102 109 111 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 105
Write 109
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 103
70% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$79
745GB free
Firmware: CC98
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 81 88 94 86 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 101
Write 92.3
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 86.2
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 75%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 101 123 134 140 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 136
Write 126
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 122
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 87%
ST350041 3AS 500GB
466GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 28 32 34 35 30 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 38
Mixed 30
SusWrite 32.1
47% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19%
Great: 37%
ST350041 3AS 500GB
406GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.7 4.6 5.2 4.7 4.8 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 20
Write 14.5
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 5
22% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 37%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB
8GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.8 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 36.3
Write 25.5
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 0.4
29% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.2
111% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 57%
WDC WD50 00AAKX-001CA0 500GB
215GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 1.2 0.6 0.8 0.3 1.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.8% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 36.7
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 0.9
34% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.6% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback