| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
| System | Quanta TW9/SW9 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Intel Base Board Product Name |
| Memory | 4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100819 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 27 '16 at 17:54 |
| Run Duration | 348 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 88% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
35.1%
Below average
|
30% 46.6 Pts
|
16% 125 Pts
|
11% 177 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 335M
Quanta(152D 0831) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 310.70
|
3.24%
Terrible
|
3% 3.86 fps
|
3% 3.78 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown M2S2G64CB88B5N-BE M2S4G64CB8HB5N-CG 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
|
23.8%
Poor
|
25% 8.7 GB/s
|
14% 4.83 GB/s
|
26% 157 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TW9/SW9 Builds (Compare 116 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Quanta TW9/SW9
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples | 39x |
| Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples | 28x |
| Core i5 M 450IntelBench 40%, 8,084 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 335MNvidiaBench 3%, 977 samples | 63x |
| GeForce GT 425MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,013 samples | 23x |
| GeForce GT 240MNvidiaBench 2%, 2,359 samples | 13x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $218 |