Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160325
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 06 '17 at 18:36
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 84.5
1-Core 37.4
2-Core 62.8
44% 61.6 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 468
37% 328 Pts
64-Core 411
26% 411 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1338 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.12.1
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.4% Below average
Lighting 38.5
Reflection 45
Parallax 55.1
31% 46.2 fps
MRender 70.3
Gravity 65.3
Splatting 57.4
52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 488
Write 339
Mixed 348
87% 392 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 19.3
92% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 37.5
54% 101 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 126%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$179
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01M02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 172
Mixed 168
130% 173 MB/s
4K Read 1.04
4K Write 3.53
4K Mixed 0.7
186% 1.76 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 101%
Great: 111%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 16GB-$19
8GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 38
Write 9.38
Mixed 7.74
18% 18.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.46
4K Write 0.58
4K Mixed 0.59
56% 1.88 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2133 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65.5% Good
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 23.1
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 14.3
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $755
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback