Hp-pavilion RS935AA-ABY m7737.dk

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion RS935AA-ABY m7737.dk (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek NODUSM3
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20061215
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '17 at 11:48
Run Duration	735 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+-$50 2,970 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	39.3% Below average	Memory 68.2 1-Core 29 2-Core 67.6 37% 54.9 Pts	4-Core 64.6 8-Core 56.8 8% 60.7 Pts	64-Core 55 3% 55 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1600 19 User benchmarks, average bench 0% MSI(1462 0400) 512MB Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	0.25% Terrible	Lighting 0.47 Reflection 0.77 Parallax 0.47 0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.25% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0706 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 32.6 Mixed 32.4 24% 32.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.31 86% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 67%
Seagate ST3500630A 500GB-$87 622 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 337GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AAF Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 113 95 52754870 (03) Spinup time 94 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 13030 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 88 60 768184487 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 19719 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8457 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 50 571998242 (C2) HDA temperature 34 50 60129542178 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 69 58 220316373 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	38.9% Below average	Read 71.7 Write 63.9 Mixed 60.7 49% 65.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.16 51% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 42%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60 16,391 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 227GB free Firmware: 3.AH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	44% Average	Read 76.4 Write 76.7 Mixed 74.2 57% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.4 91% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 44%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 203GB free Firmware: 10.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Read 56.4 Write 59.4 Mixed 56.5 43% 57.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.44 118% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 35%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60 16,391 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 35GB free Firmware: 3.AH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 76.2 Write 76.9 Mixed 71.9 56% 75 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.41 93% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 44%
ST332082 0AS 320GB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 249GB free, PID 070c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 23.2 Write 22.5 Mixed 22.8 29% 22.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.36 50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 18%
ST950032 5AS 500GB 281 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 242GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 23 Write 21.8 Mixed 22.3 29% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.33 54% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 30%
Generic USB CF Reader 8GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 8GB free, PID 6362 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	3.78% Terrible	Read 9.2 Write 7.73 Mixed 3.75 8% 6.89 MB/s	4K Read 2.94 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 12% 1 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 3.78% Great: 13%
Samsung Digital Camera 4GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 2% 1GB free, PID null Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	1.73% Terrible	Read 3.72 Write 3.72 Mixed 3.56 5% 3.67 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.006 6% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.73% Great: 4%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	16.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 5.3 15% 5.2 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.6 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hp-pavilion RS935AA-ABY m7737.dk

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)