Lenovo 9960ALF

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 9960ALF (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100201
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '17 at 03:43
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Memory 55 1-Core 26.3 2-Core 52.3 30% 44.5 Pts	4-Core 95.6 8-Core 98.4 13% 97 Pts	64-Core 104 6% 104 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% XFX(1682 3233) 1GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.12.2 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Lighting 16.2 Reflection 16.4 Parallax 21.8 13% 18.1 fps	MRender 13.4 Gravity 15.1 Splatting 18.3 13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 259 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 77 (64) Unknown 100 100 512288 (65) Unknown 100 100 111024 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1302 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 99 99 304 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 711 (B7) Unknown 100 100 5 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 25 100 197569347609 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 620 (EA) Unknown 100 100 387 (F1) Unknown 100 100 556 (F2) Unknown 100 100 578 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	32.3% Below average	Read 242 Write 113 Mixed 115 34% 157 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 15.8 4K Mixed 6.61 43% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 94.1 DQ Write 51.2 DQ Mixed 23.6 31% 56.3 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 82%
Hitachi HTS543232L9SA00 320GB 1,142 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 182GB free Firmware: FB4OC43C Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 17179869184 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 4096 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 4 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 4692 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3903 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 78 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 87 87 136072 (C2) HDA temperature 229 229 227633594392 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	33.7% Below average	Read 56.2 Write 61 Mixed 8.54 30% 41.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.25 69% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	16.1% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 4.5 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 9960ALF Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Lenovo 9960ALF

CPU
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	1x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $109

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 9960ALF

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Lenovo 9960ALF

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)