Average Bench: 0.41% (575th of 635)

Based on 19,883 user benchmarks.  Devices: 8086 2E12, 8086 2E13 Models: Intel(R) Q45/Q43 Express Chipset, Intel(R) - Express Chipset Q45/Q43, Jeu de puces Express Intel(R) Q45/Q43

Terrible average bench

The Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset averaged 99.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 1.97fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 1.49fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset is just 0.17%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 1.39fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 1.92fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 19,883 samples)
Min Avg Max
1.6 Lighting 1.97 2.1
1.1 Reflection 1.39 1.5
1.71 Parallax 1.92 2
0.53% 1.76 fps
Min Avg Max
0.6 MRender 1 1.1
1.3 Gravity 1.49 2.2
1.4 Splatting 1.85 2.1
0.4% 1.45 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 3048) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.8
0% 1.7 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 1.9
0% 1.37 fps
Dell(1028 027F)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 2
1% 1.87 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 1.9
0% 1.47 fps
HP(103C 3646)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 2
1% 1.87 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2
0% 1.5 fps
HP(103C 3646)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 2
1% 1.87 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2
0% 1.5 fps
HP(103C 3035)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 1.8
1% 1.87 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 1.8
0% 1.4 fps
HP(103C 3646)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 2
0% 1.8 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 1.9
0% 1.43 fps
19,883 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 23,915,165 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 19,883 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Dell(1028 0420) 24% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 3646) 15% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 3048) 11% 0% ± 0%
Dell(1028 027F) 11% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 3034) 7% 0% ± 0%
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 114C) 6% 0% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0276) 4% 0% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3048) 4% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 3035) 4% 0% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3047) 3% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 3648) 2% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 3647) 2% 0% ± 0%
Intel(8086 1003) 1% 0% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3049) 1% 0% ± 0%
Intel(8086 2E12) 1% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 3036) 1% 0% ± 0%
Dell(1028 02FB) 1% 0% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 1489) 0% 1% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 0028) 0% 0% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0151) 0% 0% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0154) 0% 0% ± 0%
Device(0000 0000) 0% 0% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D B062) 0% 0% ± 0%
Asus(1043 82D3) 0% 0% ± 0%
Device(105B 0DDC) 0% 0% ± 0%
Intel(8086 0026) 0% 0% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical Q45/Q43 Express Chipset Builds (Compare 7,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $67

Popular Q45/Q43 Express Chipset compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

6 months ago.

Very potato GPU, can barely run 1080p.


Excellent

8 months ago.

Awful. Just awful. Does not support 3d games and should be replaced immediately. 710 Ti is much better


Terrible

12 months ago.

I dont like it, since most games doesn't appears to work with openGL 2.0 so I recommended to NOT USING THIS, I repeat, DO NOT, USE, IT.


Terrible

9 months ago.

Because a pc won't work without a graphics card, i have to use it for school. It averages 15 fps in 3d games and works awful for even basic webbrowsing. Get a legitimate graphics card instead.


Terrible

17 months ago.

I have been using an Optiplex 760 for 6 years now and have no money to buy any better computer and i can tell you that almost any component that you can buy is better than this.


Average

5 months ago.

Bruh. Please reconsider any other option than this. I know you might be dirt cheap, but save up. If you want to play games at decent FPS, then this is not the GPU for you. It'll take you longer, but saving up for a better GPU will work out way better than this one. I had this PC for over a year, and it's pretty awful. Minecraft can barely reach 40 FPS. It usually ranges from 21-36 on average, and that's only in one chunk on the lowest settings possible (vanilla.) I can run Cities Skylines, but that doesn't come near a good amount of frames even at the lowest settings. I still can play games decently, and I can play them for hours without it being a slideshow (depending on the games and the settings (most likely on the lowest settings possible).)


Your
opinion?
635 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback