PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z800 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AECh |
Memory | 85.5 GB free of 96.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111102 |
Uptime | 1.5 Days |
Run Date | Apr 21 '20 at 20:04 |
Run Duration | 211 Seconds |
Run User | ROU-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
63.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M5000
HP(103C 1152) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50
|
52.5%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 218 227 231 189 219 MB/s
|
59.5%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
257GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 221 229 232 189 220 MB/s
|
61.2%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
192GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 26 25 21 24 MB/s
|
14.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate ST3450857SS 450GB
188GB free
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 122 122 128 108 120 MB/s
|
64.2%
Good
|
|||
Hitachi HUS156030VLS600 300GB
411GB free
Firmware: HPH1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 176 168 173 142 175 MB/s
|
97.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Cheetah 15K.7 SAS 300GB-$72
58GB free
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 183 185 186 157 179 MB/s
|
96.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Cheetah 15K.7 SAS 300GB-$72
347GB free
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 188 191 194 161 186 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 318x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 188x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 179x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 161x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 88x |
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 67x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples | 38x |
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 34x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |