Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150 22,632 User benchmarks, average bench 63% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 108 2-Core 213 76% 135 Pts	4-Core 385 8-Core 546 58% 465 Pts	64-Core 552 34% 552 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2100M 6,539 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 1909) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8573 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	8.23% Terrible	Lighting 9.73 Reflection 8.77 Parallax 11 8% 9.84 fps	MRender 11.6 Gravity 11.3 Splatting 9.83 9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.23% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,105 Write 3,519 Mixed 3,386 817% 3,670 MB/s	4K Read 512 4K Write 294 4K Mixed 350 1,380% 385 MB/s	DQ Read 1,062 DQ Write 818 DQ Mixed 865 667% 915 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 15.4 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 18.1 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2100MNvidiaBench 7%, 6,539 samples	153x
Quadro K1100MNvidiaBench 5%, 5,195 samples	117x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	106x

SSD
MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 85%, 3,736 samples	17x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	12x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	41x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	20x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	15x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $150

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16