| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 9.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus P5QL-E (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090911 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 02 '17 at 14:24 |
| Run Duration | 193 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
41.6%
Average
|
34% 49.5 Pts
|
14% 106 Pts
|
7% 111 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 843E) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.49
|
9.24%
Terrible
|
8% 10.6 fps
|
11% 13.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
37.5%
Below average
|
25% 115 MB/s
|
73% 28.2 MB/s
|
38% 72 MB/s
|
|
|
32%
Below average
|
34% 46.6 MB/s
|
100% 0.79 MB/s
| |
|
|
35.7%
Below average
|
45% 59.7 MB/s
|
119% 1.31 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate ST3300822AS 300GB
7GB free
Firmware: 3.AHH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
36.2%
Below average
|
43% 57.2 MB/s
|
90% 0.7 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
17.4%
Very poor
|
16% 5.43 GB/s
|
15% 5.17 GB/s
|
36% 111 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5QL-E Builds (Compare 143 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5QL-E
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 19x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 17x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 14x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 11x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 9x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 34% - Below average | Total price: $308 |