Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 04 '20 at 18:14
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 9xx (Nehalem Class Core i7) 50 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Memory 35.7 1-Core 22.7 2-Core 45.1 22% 34.5 Pts	4-Core 82.5 8-Core 71 11% 76.8 Pts	64-Core 83.6 5% 83.6 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 75%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 268GB 90 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 228GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 68 74 73 76 75 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 50.7 Write 45.2 Mixed 52.6 SusWrite 72.8 41% 55.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.1 259% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x4GB 2,234 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 9.5 26% 9.07 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.53 GB/s	Latency 223 18% 223 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 118%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16