Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	47% Average	Memory 49.7 1-Core 60.7 2-Core 122 44% 77.3 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 470 42% 354 Pts	64-Core 892 55% 892 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000 3,775 User benchmarks, average bench 21% HP(103C 0965) ≥ 4GB CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.63 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Lighting 27.3 Reflection 24.4 Parallax 32.7 22% 28.1 fps	MRender 36.2 Gravity 30.5 Splatting 23.2 24% 30 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2CT18 180GB 141 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 76GB free Firmware: 300i Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 469 Write 149 Mixed 191 59% 270 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 61.2 4K Mixed 14.7 91% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 55 78% 146 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 77%
Samsung 840 Series 500GB 7,390 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: BB6Q Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Read 499 Write 448 Mixed 483 106% 477 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 60.5 4K Mixed 27.2 109% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 89.3 96% 160 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 765GB free Firmware: HP64 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 127 Write 116 Mixed 104 87% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.45 99% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5270DH0-CK0 M393B2G70BH0-CK0 M393B5270DH0-CK0 M393B5270DH0-CK0 M393B5270DH0-CK0 M393B5270DH0-CK0 M393B2G70BH0-CK0 M393B5270DH0-CK0 M393B5270DH0-CK0 M393B... 64GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 16384, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 16384, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.5% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 12.2 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 5 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 162 25% 162 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	146x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	114x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	67x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16