| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160504 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 09 '17 at 00:21 |
| Run Duration | 276 Seconds |
| Run User | DNK-User |
| Background CPU | 55% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73.7%
Very good
|
72% 123 Pts
|
56% 460 Pts
|
46% 741 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 372.70
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.6%
Below average
|
26% 44 fps
|
39% 47.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
116%
Outstanding
|
99% 444 MB/s
|
190% 66.7 MB/s
|
138% 235 MB/s
|
|
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$223
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
153%
Outstanding
|
196% 911 MB/s
|
169% 64.5 MB/s
|
109% 177 MB/s
|
|
|
80.8%
Excellent
|
103% 137 MB/s
|
137% 1.35 MB/s
| |
|
General USB Flash Disk 32GB
0GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
7.62%
Terrible
|
16% 14.9 MB/s
|
28% 2.51 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
102%
Outstanding
|
115% 40.1 GB/s
|
49% 17.1 GB/s
|
53% 75.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,295 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 765x |
| Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 196x |
| Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 91x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 118x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 115x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 109x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $357 |