HP p6570jp

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP p6570jp  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '20 at 06:44
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User KHM-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 164
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 207
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
HP(103C 2A9C) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2555
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.86% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 0.91
1% 1.05 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.78
1% 1.14 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.86%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
451GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 141 129 145 155 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 172
Mixed 32
SusWrite 146
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KY996D-ELD 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.5% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 11.6
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback