Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 16 '20 at 13:28
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	72%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Core (Haswell, no TSX, IBRS) 89 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	51.2% Above average	Memory 73.6 1-Core 75.8 2-Core 166 61% 105 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 176 23% 172 Pts	64-Core 168 10% 168 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 67%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 256GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 219GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 145 145 145 143 145 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 353 Write 224 Mixed 208 SusWrite 145 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 11.8 4K Mixed 9.5 30% 9.73 MB/s	DQ Read 28.5 DQ Write 44.1 DQ Mixed 33.4 26% 35.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x8GB 5,342 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM RAM Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	67.7% Good	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 23.9 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 18.1 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 93.3 43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 145%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16